MST. AZRA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for proof of the marriage of the plaintiff The plaintiff / woman held that she had married in accordance with the customs of Islam And the marriage was registered regularly The lady alleged that her husband was arrested in a false criminal case, she and her husband were arrested and in the custody of the police, the defendant on some papers Got the impression of a thumb after which it was claimed that he was a married couple and based on that the claim of marriage with the defendant We started doing this. Her, but she never married the defendant while the plaintiff's marriage with her husband was confessed while the claim of marriage by the defendant was a contentious one and the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant was understood. No credible evidence was available while the plaintiff was. She has been living with her husband since her marriage to the plaintiff, and her marriage to the plaintiff was inconsistent because she and her witnesses allegedly gave different dates of the witnesses who were married. The inspection was not only contested, but it also raised suspicion about the defendant's alleged marriage to the plaintiffs' courts without evidence. In the context, the plaintiff / applicant was denied relief, ignoring that she was living with her husband with whom he had a legitimate marriage. The courts below declared the following conclusions for misunderstanding, non-reading and misinterpretation of evidence and misleading reasoning.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer