Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHURSHID AHMED versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN


Code of Conduct 1908 Section 100 Second Appeal The final jurisdiction of the facts The jurisdiction of the High Court jurisdiction that generally could not interfere with concurrent conclusions was not an absolute rule when the High Court could not close its eyes when the evidence. Had a false advertisement. Clearly unconstitutional conclusions were drawn by the courts, which is the reason that injustice cannot be committed simply because in the second appeal, the High Court should not have looked at the evidence which was put down by the courts below. Based on the results entered was formed. The evidence on the record cannot be supported by the evidence or if the evidence was misread or the decision was made by ignoring the evidence or based on it, the High Court had the absolute justification to consider the evidence and if If necessary, intervene below the results of the courts

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Karachi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.