WARNER BROTHERS versus IMTIAZ
Section 249A & 417 (A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) Copyright Act (XX of 1992), Sections 66, 66B, 66C, 67, 70A and 74 before the accused Appeal trial court acquits Bret's charge Based on the evidence that the recovery witness is a witness of interest, justification where the prosecution was not given the opportunity to prove the allegations in the FIR, it cannot be said that there is any possibility of conviction of the accused. No such retrieval witnesses can be called as interested persons without a trial court and in the absence of any evidence, the trial court has no substance to prove the verdict. There was no evidence and this resulted in a miscarriage of justice that ruled him out as such. Ni was not affected and was isolated in conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer
