Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WARNER BROTHERS versus IMTIAZ


Section 249A & 417 (A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) Copyright Act (XX of 1992), Sections 66, 66B, 66C, 67, 70A and 74 before the accused Appeal trial court acquits Bret's charge Based on the evidence that the recovery witness is a witness of interest, justification where the prosecution was not given the opportunity to prove the allegations in the FIR, it cannot be said that there is any possibility of conviction of the accused. No such retrieval witnesses can be called as interested persons without a trial court and in the absence of any evidence, the trial court has no substance to prove the verdict. There was no evidence and this resulted in a miscarriage of justice that ruled him out as such. Ni was not affected and was isolated in conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.