KAKA SAYAL versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail, Termination of grounds that were present with the trial court to grant bail to the accused. The alleged confrontation between ocular and medical evidence; a five-hour delay in filing an FIR. And the nature of the dispute between the parties, the alleged dispute between the ocular and the medical evidence, the trial court did not clarify, otherwise that would not be the only reason for grant of bail in this heinous crime, delaying the filing of the FIR by five hours. Was like It has been explained in the FIR itself and it is alleged that enmity was a strong motive for committing the crime. Police statements also indicated that the accused was cold-blooded and that there was credible evidence against him, the prosecution's witnesses were natural witnesses and the names of the suspects were also found. Five months after the FIR in which he was assigned the specific role of firing, the accused was granted bail on non-bailable grounds, the accused absconding for some time and his arrest was allegedly used in the crime. The pistol was recovered, the suspect was extended after being released on bail, threatened the complaining party and misused the bail exemption by threatening witnesses, in which case, not entitled to concession on bail. The bail granted to the accused was canceled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer