ZOHRA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHAD, ADVOCATE, RAWALPINDI
Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 S 41 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, R145 An unlawful lawyer and client, the client was provided with a copy of the modification copy to file in the lawsuit filed by the Council. A claim was filed against the same client, based on the said copy of the said plaintiff, that the copy of the change was not provided by the client and the case filed was related to another property to identify. Nothing was shown by the lawyer. The document relates to any property other than that which was subject to the lawsuit filed by the client and the mutation was in relation to the same property. The legality of such lawyer falls into the misconduct of section 45 of legal practitioners. The Bar Councils Act, 1973, read with 145 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976, the lawyer's serious licensing charge was suspended for six months in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
