MAQSOOD AHMED versus STATE
Definition of evidence under Section 9 (c) of the Control of Drugs Act 1997 was supported by the prosecution's witnesses' version of the prosecution, whose evidence was not denied drug retrieval during the home search, but its application Was not denied. It was not worthy of any reliance on which he failed to provide any reasonable explanation; the record did not reveal any wrongdoing of the police officers because they had treated the accused and They could not be believed that they were drugged. The accused, by his own means or substituted for the actual offender, was retained on the conviction of the accused, although the quantity of the drugs recovered, however, exceeded 10 kilograms, the trial court said. The law convicted by the accused was not in accordance with the law. No appeal for increase
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer
