Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAQSOOD AHMED versus STATE


Definition of evidence under Section 9 (c) of the Control of Drugs Act 1997 was supported by the prosecution's witnesses' version of the prosecution, whose evidence was not denied drug retrieval during the home search, but its application Was not denied. It was not worthy of any reliance on which he failed to provide any reasonable explanation; the record did not reveal any wrongdoing of the police officers because they had treated the accused and They could not be believed that they were drugged. The accused, by his own means or substituted for the actual offender, was retained on the conviction of the accused, although the quantity of the drugs recovered, however, exceeded 10 kilograms, the trial court said. The law convicted by the accused was not in accordance with the law. No appeal for increase

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Neelam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.