Find a Lawyer

STATE versus ABDUL SATTAR

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (1) The Conversation Effect The trial court overlooked the unidentified long fugitive of two accused, who supported a prosecution case against him. There was a strong case, which in itself was felonious, no doubt enough to convict the accused, but the specific description of the victim's ex, their professional habits and limitations, the duration of the fugitive and so on. There was strong evidence of other direct and circumstantial evidence in the case. All will be considered along with other evidence on record; there was no material contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses regarding the material part of the prosecution's story, which was not properly discussed by the trial court. There were no credible reasons to deny minor contradictions. The main incident was ignorance because only material discrepancies were to be considered and the names of witnesses or suspects in the site plan. Not to mention the potential power of ocular testimony cannot be taken away because of a wrong view in the case. Was. After the trial, the trial court's miscarriage of record resulted in an abortion and in the absence of any explanation by its two accused, it was difficult to decide the fate of the accused on the basis of the evidence, which During the escape. The trial order was set aside by the trial court for trial by the High Court and the case was remanded to the trial court so that according to the law, the trial of the accused should be done in a de novo trial. law firms from Jauharabad lawyer