Find a Lawyer

M. SALMAN FARUQUI versus JAVED BURKI AUTHORISED OFFICER SECRTARY MINISTARY OF WATER AND POWER

Government Employees (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules 1973 Rr 5 (i) (iii) and 6 Inquiries where disputes between the parties were disputed, the competent officer should usually be assigned to the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee where Decided once under R5. (iii) Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 That inquiry was not required by the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, it was not considered that the final competent officer could change this view. If additional evidence arises in the latter case, the relevant regulations did not also provide for the competent officer's decision under R5 (i) (iii) that public servants should face inquiries, evidence in dismissal. Want to present then and then urge it to be delivered. An inquiry from an inquiry officer or an inquiry committee inquiry officer who was not appointed and no charge was made in this case; oral evidence was not required to be filed with the CI. Government employees were entitled to cross-examination of witnesses, where the rules against the civil servant are pending, if they were examined under R6 (3) of the Government Employees (Employment and Discipline) Rules, 1973. Was in the position. Interested Inquiry To Contest famous supreme court advocate from Swat lawyer