NOOR ALI versus PARVEEN IQBAL
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 Section 4 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Applying for Section 13 Proof Two kilograms of explosive gelatin was recovered from the possession of the suspects which could not be traced. Was not kept No one in the area could dare to make a statement against the suspects who were handed over to the parcels of explosives to prosecution witnesses belonging to the Pir family, no doubt, in a state court in the trial. There was no proper and proper investigation by the lawyer. Their statements under Section 161, CCPC, but such techniques can be ignored in cases where the conviction or punishment of the accused under section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 was also declared a consequence. , The recovery of detonators and timers from the suspects was suspicious as they were not the same. The accused in the FIR was acquitted of the charge under Section 13A of the Arms Ordinance.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer