BABA KHAN versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOM
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Sections 32 and 79 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The misrepresentation or misrepresentation of the goods on the border on imported goods meant that the Dryport statements had to be cleared from customs. The High Court correctly found on the border where the imported goods were transported to the dry port where it avoided payment of duty or was prohibited from importing goods at the border with prohibited goods. That the relevant authorities were entitled to check on the border where such announcement was made, whether the goods complied with the declaration, so that any change in the goods did not occur at the border from the starting point to the dry port. Coin. In attracting the provisions of section 32 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969, if any of the material details is wrong, there is no fault in it. High Court Supreme Court interprets Section 32 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969, refusing to interfere with the decision and dismissing the High Court petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Dina lawyer