MUHAMMAD SHAREEF versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 265F (7) Contempt of Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 4 Right to Proof of Evidence, accused of issuing summons to defense The trial court denied the request. The witnesses, the proceedings issued, but on two consecutive dates, the defense witnesses were called absent, which withdrew the order to summon the defense witnesses of the court without any mental jurisdiction, and the task in particular in relation to the provisions of the law. Needed to be done and implemented. In this way, the fundamental right of defense recognized under the law can be denied only if the court concludes that the right is being abused due to misconduct or delayed or defeated in the pursuit of justice. Was to record in writing to the court. For the refusal to proceed to the preparation of defense witnesses or to record written reasons for the preparation of any document or other matter which may be deemed necessary, Eri, charged with the prosecution for compelling the attendance of the defense witnesses. The verbal motion of the accused can also be issued and there was no need to make a formal written request in this regard. When the court issued proceedings, the objection in this regard could not be reached. Justice at the altar of technology
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Nilore lawyer