PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (URBAN), ISLAMABAD versus FULL BENCH, N.I.R.C., ISLAMABAD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (G) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application unfair labor practice Implementing the principle of consistency Workers were accused of being in charge of the responsibility of single NRIs. The bench allowed the workers' requests under section 22. Industrial Relations Ordinance-A (8) (g) of 1969 on the basis that such applications of co-workers on similar charge sheets have already been accepted by the single bench of the NIRC and they have been accepted by the single KNR The full bench of the C judge has maintained. The NIRC bench was also retained by the full bench of the NIRC before the High Court by the employer corporation, as the present workers were not parties to the proceedings, therefore, they did not extend the decision in their favor. Even if the earlier decision was a decision personally, the charge against the current workers was the same against their co-workers. The charge sheet was issued and the co-workers were co-operative. The IRC's single bench, which was upheld by the entire bench of the NIRC, relied on the principle of consistency. Both courts were his orders were approved in accordance with the law, requests had been excluded in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Quetta lawyer