Find a Lawyer

GUL HASSAN DERO versus STATE

Control Section 497 (2) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 and 51, Section 9 (c) of the Control of Drug Substances Act, 1997 under the auspices of the accused Come under. According to the prosecution's case, there was a huge difference in the alleged recovery of drugs from the accused and the accused in the case showed in the report by the Chemical Examiner, according to the prosecution's case. The arrest of the accused also needs to be taken seriously which cannot be resolved without recording any evidence, he was charged with sanction of bail contained in section 51 (1) of the Drug Control Act 1997, he Did not apply to the suspect's case and the allegations against him need further investigation. Considered by Section 497 (2), the CR PC accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances patent advocate from Layyah lawyer