MUSTAFA ALI SAJID versus PRESIDENT, COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 To maintain a complaint application, the applicant filed a notice of complaint to the employer establishment after his termination, but instead of filing a complaint with the Labor Court, Five months after the job was terminated, an appeal was filed before the service tribunal, which was dismissed. The service tribunal stated that there was no jurisdiction of the service tribunal during this time Section 2A was introduced in the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, where employees could be appealed before the service tribunal, but it Instead, he filed a complaint before the service tribunal, instead of filing a fresh appeal. Employed Section 2A, Service Tribunals Act, 1973, under section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, with a delay of approximately one year and four months, established under a Federal Law Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961. Was brought into Korean by the US. , Ci will be deemed to have a special purpose and the service tribunal will have exclusive jurisdiction to resolve the employee's complaint. The Labor Court rightly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer