Find a Lawyer

SHAHDAD BALOCH versus PAKISTAN HERALD COMPANY

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Requesting Change of Affidavit of Evidence by Filing a New Amendment Circle Postponed, employees postponed to file an application. Sworn in evidence before the commencement of cross-examination of the employees but stated that the Labor Court had rejected the application for good cause in Industrial Relations Ordinance, 969 or any provision in the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 do not have. The parties to the affidavit of evidence in the case of a complaint petition, however, could not cite any rule, rule, notification or even a circular issued by any competent authority under any law, in which The Chief Parties have been issued under an Act to accept the affidavit in evidence as a substitute for examination. Agreeing to put your witnesses in the witness box or the Chief of Cross, Examination and Re-examination, the Labor Appellate Tribunal ordered, according to the observation, that the process of accepting the affidavit be closed. criminal advocate from Guddu lawyer