Find a Lawyer

MST. ALAM JAN versus BIBI ZAINAB

He lived a long life in relation to Article 64 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), declarations of suits 39, 42 and 54, cancellation of documents and injunction, during which he also declared marriage and served it. I joined and his local certificate, ID card and all the documents related to his job proved that he was the son of a permanent confidant of the deceased's parents and his life through the plaintiff's closest person and other parents. During BM, he proved that he believed in the deceased as his legitimate son and did not misread or misread the evidence. What occurred was not misunderstanding dismissed the appeal documents

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013

• Syed ZIA-UD-DIN v. SHABIR AHMED 2013 CLC 1395
• BALOCHISTAN IRRIGATION AND POWER EMPLOYEES UNION v. CHAIRMAN, BALOCHISTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PLC(CS) 1417
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. BIBI ASIFA 2013 CLC 1446
• NOOR AHMED v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1452
• HAMID ALI v. Mst. FARZANA 2013 YLR 1509
• SHAMSULLAH v. State 2013 MLD 1527
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1535
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD. 2013 YLR 1559

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2013 →

best law firms from Choppar Hatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes