Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NAWAZ versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD

The appeal against the Pakistan Penal Code Section 417 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), sections 300 and 34 of the trial was acquitted after reviewing the evidence recorded on the basis of the principles of criminal justice administration, the motive. The lawsuit was filed for incontrovertible reasons. Because of the incident, the contradiction between witnesses and medical evidence and the substitution of the accused for anyone named in the FIR, who obtained bail prior to his arrest, is of personal and interest to the investigator during the trial. The evidence was not corroborated by independent evidence, the recovery of the crime weapon also had no benefit. Similarly, the forensic laboratory was never sent to the trial court; in these circumstances the accused was properly acquitted and there was no room for interference in the acquittal unless it was felt that There has been gross injustice. Criminal justice management or a trial court's decision is wrong, completely illegal and no conclusions can be drawn on the theory of evidence except whether the accused was guilty or aborted by justice. The reason the evidence was completely misrepresented because the order of acquittal cannot be interfered with, because only upon re-evaluation of the evidence, will the court come to any conclusion that will acquit the accused from court. Provided that both results are reasonably possible advocate from Dina lawyer