Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD HUSSAIN BOKHARI versus ATHAR BIBI

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Claims for Four Specific Performance of the Sale Contract The plaintiff / applicant filed a lawsuit for possession by the specific performance of the sale agreement on the ground that the original owner of the land in the dispute was the defendant / defendant. Aliyah's interest was in the forefront, entering. The land sale agreement with the plaintiff was obtained by his lawyer and the seller received a substantial amount of money, which the trial court sued in the suit that the original owner of the land was legally with the plaintiff through his lawyer. Had contracted the sale and received the money from the seller. The appellate court considered and set aside the trial court's ruling and ruling that it did not foreclose in favor of the defendant who sold the land through his lawyer and never took the lawyer's counsel in the dispute. Was. Evidence on the records that allegedly sold the land had proved completely that the predecessor in the interest of breath was the landowner in the dispute and that, through his lawyer, he had signed a valid sale agreement with the plaintiff / applicant, Appointed appropriately and authoritatively by the registered General Power of Attorney, which was not denied by the defendants' witnesses, the decision of the Appellate Court below also prohibits the misrepresentation of oral and documentary evidence on the record and the law. Was not lasting in the eyes of the High Court. And maintained solid court order. best law firm from Mian Walli lawyer