AAMIR ALI versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 25 and 2A Rules for the Competitive Examination of Federal Services Rule Estoppel, which appeared in the Central Superior Services Examination, applied to the Federal Public Service Commission Rules. What was the challenge under which technical and non-technical articles were submitted. The examiner of the Central Superior Services claimed that these rules were too strict and unreasonable and were lacking in modern times. The petitioner had prayed that the rules violating the guaranteed fundamental rights of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) would be killed to the petitioner, who himself accepted the rules. And the rules and regulations and rules were obliged to apply before appearing for the examination, there was a way to challenge the rules and regulations, unless otherwise stated by the competent authority. , This cannot be changed by a High Court decision. Under the rules of the alternative or the constitutional jurisdiction, new rules, according to their rules, had only the authority to interpret the law and did not have the authority to play the role of policy makers. And the High Court had no jurisdiction to substitute it. Policy makers decide for themselves
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from FR Kohat lawyer