FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus BEGUM SUGHRA HAQUE
The defendant was charged with clearing the shoulder bags of other accomplices in Section 25 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 402 B / 365 A / 34, but did not present any testimony to substantiate this fact. It was stated that the bag owned by the accused persons was illegally in the sale cell, cannot be relied upon for the absence of any evidence. Confession on the same suspicions was not sufficient to prove the crime on which the circumstances sought to be relied upon should be proved beyond any doubt, there was no proper evidence against the accused and the case against him was doubtful and the case was suspicious. The trial was set aside for the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Dargai lawyer
