SHAHID NADEEM versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Personal Use of the Landlord On the first appeal personally, two shops were vacated in the same building, which is the fact that the tenant took the opportunity to explain this to the court. Instead brought it to notice. Given that the aforementioned shops were not suitable for this requirement, the landlord continued to deny the fact that any of the shops had been evacuated on the basis of the tenant's charge and he was able to obtain an order in his favor. Nevertheless, the First Appeal Court gave contempt court notice to the landlord to make a false statement but said that the proceedings were dropped for technical reasons, although the landlord was given an opportunity to state that the leave Huawei shops have failed to meet their needs, but they missed out on such opportunities when they did not want to do so. Opposed the effort. The additional evidence in this regard is to guide the landlord's record of the circumstances of the landlord's failure to establish his power, thus increasing the need for the premises needed, thus making his case known.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jaranwala lawyer