Find a Lawyer

DIRECTOR-GENERAL, NATIONAL GUARDS versus MUJAHID MAJOR ABDUL MAJID BHATTI

National Guards Act 1973 Sections 9 and 16 National Guards Rules, 1973, R13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 (3) Intra-Court of Appeals on the restoration of a constitutional application for their consent without the transfer approval The sight was taken. As Article 199 (3) of the Constitution, the applicant was an army force and was under the Pakistan Army Act 1958, the High Court declared the objection invalid and the transfer of the applicants was illegal and the constitution was invalid. The requests were allowed The representatives against the disciplinary force of the Disc Disc and their transfer were rejected by the Chief of Army Staff as such applicants were subjected to the Pakistan Army Act 1952 at the relevant time and the constitution was requested. Could not be sustained in view of Article 199 (3). Section 9, despite the National Guards Act 1973, can be exchanged without the consent of the applicants, in accordance with Section 16 of the National Guards Act, 1973, there was no factual or legal power to the charge of the duties, the constitutional petition The entertainer's High Court order was not upheld and constitutional petitions were accepted on the grounds that the intra-court appeal was rejected. female advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer