Find a Lawyer

ARIFA AMJAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 494/495 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (1) Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), 5 561 Woman accused of prosecution proceedings and sued judges Has contracted The overwhelming delay of about 1/3 months in filing an FIR for compulsion and resentment against any of the defendants without coercion and will was clearly not made clear that initially But the female accused was shown and treated as a prosecution witness. On refusing to support the prosecution, he was made a partner in Sections 494 and 495, the PPC was unreasonable, and wrongfully applied for section 10 (1) of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979. In the circumstances of the trial, whatever crime was committed against the accused and the charges were not proved, the courts cannot privatize the cases of those who still believe in the false ideas of the people of the past. The Islamic day did not work to help those who were working against the Quran and the Sunnah, where spouses were puberty and needle words, and their work was not in violation of God's ordinances. Victims of family pride, continuing the proceedings against the accused in the case, in the circumstances invalidated the court process and accordingly were ordered to be discharged. power of attorney advocate Sangote lawyer