SABIR MEHMUD BHATTI versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Sections 2 (xxviii) and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art: 199 Workers' Complaints Argument The evidence on record fully proved that the barren options of work that required employees to perform He was neither a manual nor a maulvi, but he was working as a caretaker, the Labor Appellate Tribunal had, in the circumstances, rightly stated that the applicant does not fall in appreciation of the labor and Section 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. The complaint filed under A. is not eligible for the complaint.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Rohri lawyer
