Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 316 was not disputed by the incident, but it was a sudden fight. There was no previous rivalry between the accused and the victim, which only caused a single blow to the bricks and did not work in a cruel or hopeless manner. Whether or not the accused was charged under the circumstances, when the offense was committed under section 161616, the PPC case was subsequently settled between the parties outside the court and the settlement process was completed by default. The deceased's widow appeared before the tort and confirmed that he and the deceased's other legal heirs had received money The accused was later pardoned and charged, in this case, already sentenced to life imprisonment for carrying out the extremity of justice. property advocates from Neelam lawyer