MUHAMMAD BAQA versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 definition of evidence included the O1 recovery of the rifle in the evidence against the accused in which it was allegedly used, the ocular testimony from the complainant and the prosecution's other witnesses and the confessional statement to the accused, not to the expert. Neither was sent to him nor his recovery was observed. Independent witnesses disclosed this kind of healing restoration of the rifle was not relied upon by the trial court's complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses, who were the victim's real uncle and brother, who were closely related to the deceased, They did not rely on justification in which the case was not filed. According to the mandatory provisions under Sections 164 and 364, the CCP could not be made the basis of the sentence, especially when it was not substantiated by other evidence, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. , The accused acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer
