Find a Lawyer

M.D. TAHIR ADVOCATE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional petitioner, a lawyer, in his constitutional petition alleges that the Federation of Pakistan filed a case against India before the International Court of Justice for damages for falling under the Navy plane. But the respondent's failure to do so excluded the said case. The petitioner had prayed that the respondents (including the Attorney General for Pakistan) who had discussed the case before the International Court of Justice and a senior advocate who was also a member of the National Security Council of Pakistan and his Worked as The International Court of Justice's ad-hoc judge should be ordered to return all the money to the receiving state for pursuing the case abroad and the state should be directed to provide false advice for defaming the country. Take legal action against individuals. The view of the world is correct, the constitutional petition was not filed with good faith, but to discredit the respondents, to the detriment of the ad-hoc judge of the national interest representing Pakistan in the International Court of Justice and the Attorney General of Pakistan. , Who argued in this case, honored himself by obtaining a direction during the proceedings in the International Court of Justice. From the court to India and Pakistan to resolve their disputes including Jammu and Kashmir through negotiations, constitutional application was barred jobs for advocates from Leepa lawyer