SIDDIQUE MUHAMMAD MALIK versus IMMAD IFTIKHAR MALIK
Companies Ordinance 1984 Sections 50, 159, 161 (8), 179 and 290 Directors' challenge to convene an extraordinary general meeting, jointly meeting on the address of the company under the ordinance of the company under the ordinance of the company Issue notices to members of Commonly issued, illegal illegal illegal was illegal and invalid, because, each member had to issue separate and independent notices and should be served individually on the same member and shared on the company address. Notices were issued by the Company Accountant The company address was not a member's home address and the Company Accountant was not their representative There were such material flaws in issuing the notice, resulting in the applicants The result was to stop them from participating in the proceedings. Prior to the meeting when the provisions of the issuance of notice and service under section 50, Companies Ordinance, were not valid in 1984, the holding of the abnormal meeting was not lawful and the proceedings in it were neither legal nor legal. Nor was the company bound to suspend the circumstances because such an action was illegal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
