RAJ BIBI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Suit for Declaratory Gift Proof Plaintiff asserts that the land in the dispute was gifted by the husband in favor of the mutation, but the defendants, who inherited the deviation Who confirmed in their favor. The purpose of her recovery was certified in favor of the plaintiff at the request of her husband only when the change in favor of his wife was affirmed at the time the statement made by the plaintiff's husband showed that the pending question The land was transferred in favor of it. The plaintiff's cumulative effect: The plaintiff's husband's statement was before the Revenue Officer that the land was transferred to his wife and the possession was handed over to him as a gift because the transaction was a complete gift because the husband had paid the Revenue Officer. Was convinced that his wife had accepted the gift. Rehabilitation or life estate will be void and when the influence and influence of the gifted will not be effected, the courts under which the plaintiff's wife is entitled. The transfer of the land to me was termed as property that it meant for the maintenance of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kahror Pacca lawyer