NASRULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE
Proof of Section 9 of the Drugs Act 1997, the recovery of 980 grams of marijuana from the capture of the accused at the time of the arrest and search of evidence, proved that the prosecution's evidence proved that the accused was alien to the witnesses, the policeman Could not submit against it. It could be said that he was not an independent witness and could not possibly be blamed for his lying in this case, however, without challenging his conviction, he had merely requested a reduction in his conviction. He had no previous history of drug dealing and spent a total of two years and five months in prison. He faces seven years' imprisonment \ RI, which was handed down by the trial court to the accused. He had already been sentenced to prison, while in those cases the penalty was also significantly reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Neelam lawyer