Find a Lawyer

ALI NOOR (PVT.) LTD. CO. versus M.V. ANNA II

Admiralty Suit for High Court Ordinance 1980 Admissibility Suit for Defamation 1980 Section 3 (2) The plaintiff was appointed as the plaintiff company to exclude fertilizer cargo from the vessel, while carrying the vessel from the vessel, from the hydraulic grip luggage. The vessel was loaded and attached to it, the defendant's vessel crane, was released and due to the alleged defect in the crane began to descend rapidly, the removal of the ship, the ship was dropped, the jetty fell and Was completely damaged, the plaintiff company sued for restoration, claiming damages from the ship Rs 77,50,000. Appointed a competent and experienced surveyor to survey the vessel and the damaged occupant who submitted a damage report. According to the surveyor's estimate, the replacement cost, including the total cost of repairing the occupation, was Rs. 4,50,000. He said that the estimate was not challenged or invalidated by the plaintiff against the survey. ? This is to be encountered with any document containing this or its different information, the claim of the plaintiff was substantially endorsed by a high court-approved survey report and accordingly by an experienced, qualified and independent surveyor. The estimate appears. top civil advocates from Shahpur Chakar lawyer