Find a Lawyer

M.E.F.T. PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD versus UNITED BANK LIMITED

Accused of violating the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 Supreme Court order, the procedure for the disposal of vehicles imported under the yellow cab scheme clearly, under reference petitioners, if it wants to supply 141 vehicles. So, that was clearly indicated. In addition to paying the price of the vehicles 90, the Supreme Court's order had to set aside the other liabilities, which, however, were violated by the respondents' record. It warmly showed that the applicants had offered to pay 90% of the balance in relation to the controversial 141 vehicles, besides the balance etc. 90% but the respondents refused to accept it and the applicants refused to accept it. Offered to supply it. It said that on the directives of the applicant's principal, the vehicles were recovered from Pakistan. The balance was not paid by the Ministry of Commerce to allow them to re-export the said vehicles, not suspected, not in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision, but the balanced value of these vehicles by recognized parties. No attempt was made to pay the Supreme Court order. The principal of the applicants could not wait indefinitely for payment of the equilibrium price of these vehicles; its re-export could not have been in violation of the apex court's order. Otherwise, the applicants Has limited its claim for self-harm. With the export of these 141 vehicles, they could not turn over and begin contempt proceedings against the respondents. patent advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer