MUHAMMAD BANARAS versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence was not appreciated until the time when witnesses disclosed that the evidence was disclosed through medical evidence, the witnesses were not only convicted but also confessed and their testimony was non-existent. Was reasonable which was neither reasonable. Unconfirmed to be convinced of any credible evidence, the prosecutor tried to broaden the net and come forward with an exaggerated version in which it was not possible for the innocent to be linked to the real culprits of the number of accused. , The recovery of weapons of crime was unnecessary. Also, the eyewitness account was not verified by the evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer
