SHAH MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 324/34 Evidence of the presence of witnesses at the time of the incident was extremely suspicious The medical evidence was not contradicted by the evidence testimony nor was it necessary to clarify the position of the accused. Eyewitnesses were not certified for any independent source of interest and the complexity of the crime was identified and witnesses were not confirmed, the motive for the incident was not proven if the prosecution's case was suspected, the whole of the accused There was no immediate benefit to the family, ie. The father and three sons, formerly involved in the case by the complaining party due to the enmity, were alleged to have taken advantage of the doubt in the circumstances and were acquitted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from More kunda lawyer