Awards 14, 17 and 26 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, rule the court unregistered award, create immovable property rights, retain the judgment of the trial by the trial court decided the decision of the court Was. The court was dismissed The contents of the property show that the rights created for the immovable property but not the award were recorded. Such award failed to convey the property rights in favor of the concerned party. Failure to award the award, whether it suffers from any weakness or fault, or has violated the provisions of the law and failed to examine the award whether in this case the need for Section 26, Arbitration Act 1940 Whether or not the trial court did not even look, if there was an award, the arbitration agreement would have The trial court made the award award roll by the trial court based on the contrary or similar arbitration agreement and according to the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the order of the trial court was not sustainable without applying its independent mind. , As it faces material mismanagement and chronic error. The trial court case was set aside and the matter was remanded to the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
