NAZIR MASEH versus PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT NO.V,KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (4) Request for Complaint On the filing of a complaint for dismissal from the employee dismissed for non-prosecution, the employer / filing statement was given and the matter was filed with the applicant / employee. Delayed for evidence, case adjourned for nine times Most of the employee or his / her representative failed to present the evidence Applicant / Employee to file affidavit deadline Was granted while the employer was present the Labor Court dismissed the complaint for illegal action and filed a complaint. Recovery application Job's job was also dismissed as the order dismissing his complaint was dismissed because the Labor Court should have recorded the employer's statement instead of dismissing the complaint and the case on merit Should be decided because labor court was required to give. Qualification decision only when the affidavit of evidence was filed in support of the employee's request for a complaint, while the employee failed to enter the affidavit in the statement while he was absent in the evidence The burden of proof was also on him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
