NISAR MASIH versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 324/34 were commended only after the evidence was filed in which the FIR was lodged with all the necessary details. Witnesses were closely linked not only to the victim but also to the accused and to record serious injuries to their persons so that their presence could be confirmed on the spot during the incident. It has been alleged that in its statements under Section 342, the CCP also confessed to the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident, the ocular witness was permanent, affirmative and clearly credible whose confession was a motive. The suspect was found to have stained knives and daggers from human blood, medical evidence and reasonably prompt self-defense taken by the FIR suspects were not proven, which did not explain the injuries. Was The eyewitnesses, but also through the prosecution, had proved that they would not be harmed. They deliberately refused to share in the crime, and in these cases the conviction and sentence of the accused were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jatoi lawyer