ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE
The failure to name the accused in the Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 497 Convention (10 of 1984), Article 22 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 39595 / B 34 guarantees was complicated because Didn't know about them before. Failure to conduct an identity parade, such as the absence of significant features of the accused in the FIR or deep evidence of evidence such as the holding of the identity parade, was not valid at the bail-out stage until the other In this case, the identity parade was not held, requiring the law, which was the only way to test the truth of the evidence of witnesses who had the opportunity to see the accused and claim to have identified the vehicle's snatch terror. Was an act of bail which the defendants denied under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Kot Addu lawyer
