BENGAL CORPORATION versus MIDDLE EAST BANK LTD
Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997 AXLI, R 19 Banking Companies (Debt Restructuring, Debt and Finance Recovery) Act (XV of 1997), Section 21 Limitation Act (1908) IX), Section 5 and Article App68 appeals dismissed for non-prosecution reading, the panel of lawyers engaged in pursuing the appeal, none of the lawyers appeared on the date set for the hearing and the appeal. Non-prosecution was dismissed Appeal for re-entry of appeal was within 30 days, but 30 per Article 68 of the Limitation Act, 1908 Appeared more than a day later, the appellants as well as the appellants were deliberately and deliberately defending the delay under Section 5, the Limitation Act, 1908, without any justifiable explanation for the delay. The petition was filed under OXL, R, 19, the CPC party had to move the matter cautiously and the matter was not delayed and consequently the appeal was not re-admitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer