KARAM BAKHSH versus SAIRA BIBI
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), certifying the modification of the 42 suit declaration, the plaintiff's brothers claimed that the plaintiff had sold the land to them in dispute and that they were entitled to the sale price. Was found later. Variations on the land granted in their favor The defendant in his claim that the plaintiff alleged that the change in the sale of the land in favor of the defendants was fraudulent and illegal and that he did not have any Refused to enter into a sale transaction, the plaintiff was an illiterate woman and no one was on record to show evidence that she was benefited by independent counsel from the husband and the plaintiff's son of a close family member. It was not shown at any stage of the case that it is the responsibility of the defendants to go beyond any doubt. Prove it The alleged sale transaction in his favor was transparent and legitimate, failing to prove through any evidence of the appellate court under the circuit. Matters have rightly been found that the defendants / who were the beneficiaries of the change, their decision to fail regardless of the decision and the failure to make any mistake, the order passed by the appellate court Could not intervene through the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer