NAZIM POLY SACK LIMITED MUSLIM TOWN LAHORE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Customs Act 1969 Section 35 (4), Schedule I, CHAP 39, HDG 3902 1000 and CHIP 63, HDG 6503 3100 Section RO 710 (I) / 94, Dated 13 7 1994 Section RO 546 (I) 94, History 96 1995 Central Excise Act (I of 1944), Sections 3, 3CC and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Conduct of Central Excise Duty Leases, Facts on Polypropylene Strips Failure to demand no duty such as whether such strips were salable provided the effect of polypropylene strips was of synthetic material and the dispute over the classification of goods as textile rather than plastic was rejected. Is no such demand was justified because it strips the compensation, regardless of the actual weight regardless of a question was raised which should appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Choppar Hatta lawyer