The trial court ruled in response to the evidence filed in the second appeal filed by the petitioner Importer, second appeal relating to the limitation of section 100 Second Appeal, Section 21 and 30 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, and the lower appeal. Was maintained by the court. It was raised by the seller that the case was filed beyond the limitation period and any concession given to the claimant in the lower appeal phase on the issue of limitation was similar to the seller in the second appeal before the High Court. Did not refrain from challenging where the threshold question was. There was no pure question of law, such question could not be recorded without accepting evidence on record. On the question of limitations, the information recorded by the trial court was accepted before the lower appeals court and such limitation. The ban could not be the case. The second appeal was reopened where the findings of other matters were not inconsistent with the decisions of the two courts did not guarantee interference. rence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
