Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MOBIN KHAN

Control of the Narcotic Sub-Metals Act 1997, Sections 497 (5) and 497 (1) of 1997, Third Providence Probation (Enforcement of Head) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 6 , 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 51 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the bail bail was granted by the High Court to the accused on the basis of a legal delay which gave ten years. Weight was heroin. Section 497 (1), CCPC allegedly recovered the provisions of the third provision, in view of section 5 (1), read with Section 9 (b) and (c) of the Control of Drugs. Cannot be served with the approval of the previous accused. The Act, 1997, even if it was agreed on the basis of arguments, excludes the application of section 497 (1), the third provision on the CRPC by section 51 (1) of the Narcotic Substances Control Act 1997 Was not done Which is mistaken, since the death penalty is punished under section 9 (c) of section 9 of the said Act), according to the total delay under section (b) of the third section of section 497 (1) of each statute. It will be two years since the CCP, which admits that it had not yet expired and that the accused could not be guaranteed due to a legal delay, resulted in an appeal for leave to appeal. The appeal was changed and the accused's bail was canceled by the High Court in this case. criminal advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer