FACTORY MANAGER, TREET CORPORATION LTD. versus MUHAMMAD BABAR
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Sections O15 (3) (b) and (4) dismissed on the basis of absence of employment. After leaving the notice and conducting a domestic inquiry against him, he left for more than ten days. The employee argued that he had been absent from duty because of filing a criminal case against him. I was involved in investigating the matter even though the employee remained involved. Investigation with others, but only for a few hours and after he was acquitted he was discharged after the investigation and in this case he was not arrested, there is no real reason, hence the employee Absent from duty for a long time without being absent from duty. A legitimate justification or lawful excuse, on the basis of which the employee may be discharged on leave without the permission of the superiors and without leave, in the absence of anything by this record when it is suggested that the employee has given his Has been seriously or maliciously prosecuted or subjected to trade union activities, the Labor Court did not justify reinstating an employee with benefits retained, especially when questioned. Was against equality, fairness and fairness, and the inquiry officer somehow managed to partially The Court's decision did not appear likely to pass without giving attention to the facts of a case, it was a different situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Multan lawyer