LAKSON TOBACCO COMPANY LIMITED versus SAFDAR HUSSAIN SHAH
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sections O15 (3) (b) and (4) dismissed from employment on the charge of theft. After the dismissal, he was sued by a member of the Inquiry Employee staff for issuing a showcase notice, a charge sheet and an inquiry against him alleging that he had stolen a cigarette bundle from the employer's department production, While interests, justice requirements, equity and fair play are guaranteed, an inquiry against an employee should have been handed over to another establishment or the Department of Labor. Oh, neutral and honest officers were dismissed from service employee on the basis of which they were accused of stealing exported bundle of stolen cigarettes and did not know. Where the same disappeared, no case was filed against the employee No evidence was filed against the employee There is no evidence against the employee that the action taken against the employees was economically tainted and the retaliation employee dismissed from the job. The allegation, without inquiry and without provocation, could not, under the circumstances, be justified and sustained by law and justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
