Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NISAR DOSSA versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN DOSSA

Companies Ordinance 1984 Sections 10 and 178 Company Directors were selected by the Commissioner of Government Assignment to reduce the number of directors to handle the business of the company and by order of the High Court through which the directors of the company An annual general meeting was called for selection. The appellants were that while the official Assistant had reduced the number of directors himself, the appellants themselves created a situation when an appellant, in contravention of the High Court order, tried to preside over the annual general meeting and All the appellants later boycotted the selection. The Government Assistant did not change the number of directors appointed by them for the purpose of the selection directors, so there were seven who were selected in the election and it cannot be said that they are in accordance with section 178 (1) of the Companies Ordinance. Violation, 1984 did not have the number of directors reduced by the official Assignee and the elections according to the High Court order were held correctly immigration advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer