CRESCENT PAK. INDUSTRIES -LTD. versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PAKISTAN SECRETARIAT, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Inquiry Officer's Intervention for Termination Due to Termination of Articles 25A & 38 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Interventions with the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal were required to examine the inquiry process to satisfy themselves about the legality and validity of the inquiry proceedings, and the detection of the Inquiry Officer by both the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Can be checked to determine if it is suitable ? The bereaved employee was afforded an opportunity to defend himself and whether the inquiry officer had conducted the inquiry in a fair and equitable manner, but the inquiry officer's search alone could not be ignored or assigned on this basis. It may have been possible to approach the inquiry officer. The evidence and the content of the evidence brought before the Inquiry Officer can be changed only by the Labor Court or the Labor Appellate Tribunal when there is evidence of misrepresentation or misrepresentation on the record, on or against, or against. Wasn't effective.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Parachinar lawyer