JEHANZEB AZIZ DAR versus MAERSK LINE
Section 7 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, R 9 Reject Admiralty Suit for Non-Prosecution In keeping with such order, a single High Court judge dismissed plaintiff's request for adjournment and OAX The application for an illegal prosecution application was dismissed, R9, CPC was filed to restore the claim raised by the defendants that such request was not enforceable and the High Court Ordinance's Admiralty An appeal was to be filed under section 7 of the jurisdiction, both remedies were available to the plaintiff, there was no legal in the application under O IX, R 9, CPC. There was no error and he was competent and competent to maintain the law and did not challenge the factual grounds for rejecting the order by the defendants, who only opposed the restitution of the case on legal grounds. To the knowledge of the defendants, the prima was disturbing, the application of the costs of the circumstances allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Rahwali lawyer
