Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE QUETTA

The Press and Publication Ordinance of the Printing Press, Articles 42 and 54 of Pakistan 1990 (1973), Declaration of Arts 185 (3) and 199 suits and a permanent injunction have been filed for the arrest of the land plot in the case dispute. It prevents the respondent from expelling the plot and also obtaining interim orders from the court which is still pending the operative petition, in which case a constitutional petition was filed in the High Court claiming that the case Cannot be considered an appropriate treatment and its practice has been sought. The constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court High Court dismissed the constitutional petition, stating that the applicants had already obtained immunity from the jurisdiction of the civil court and with similar prayer on the same facts, the constitutional petition The proceedings before the High Court by the High Court were not viable even if the applicant was allegedly rejected by the plot in the dispute, he could easily have referred to the civil court for proper proceedings by the High Court. Was rejected and the order of the High Court could not be interfered with. immigration advocates contact from Thatta lawyer