MUHAMMAD MEHDI versus THE STATE
The accused accused of refusing to accept bribe as complainant in response to the Evidence of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). But the money was withdrawn from the pocket of the accused by the magistrate who tried to flee the court premises and was arrested. Such behavior of the accused had come a long way, pointing to his guilt, passing the defective currency note was noted by the magistrate who had stood and witnessed the transaction. On export, outside the court prosecution, the circumstances, beyond any doubt, were made against the accused, the High Court justified in taking a gentle approach because of the lengthy trial. That had been encountered for more than eleven years and had already been considered for punishment. A month is enough to achieve justice, the conviction of the accused on the record of the case, the Supreme Court refuses to interfere in H's decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Satyana Bangla lawyer
